Complex Systems &
Space Governance.
Unit 03 is an applied research node of the International Health Research Institute, operating under Pillar II of IHRI's institutional framework. Its work focuses on complex systems science, AI governance, and space health research.
Advancing research in space health and extreme environment physiology, AI governance frameworks, and the application of high-reliability organisation principles to complex systems — generating evidence that informs policy and practice.
Research Areas
Unit 03 conducts applied research in complex systems science, AI governance, and space health under IHRI's Pillar II research mandate.
Space Health &
Extreme Environments
Investigating the metabolic and physiological constraints of deep-space isolation and planetary analogs.
Research Focus
"Mitigating systemic failure in closed-loop life support through metabolic homeostasis."
Resilient Governance
& Cognitive AI
Investigating the application of Active Inference and cognitive AI frameworks — including the NERVE and CORTEX architectures — to AI governance challenges in complex organisational systems.
Research Focus
"Developing governance frameworks for AI-driven decision support in high-reliability organisational environments."
Unit 03 Research Leadership
Dr. A. Hodgers
Principal Investigator, Unit 03 — Complex Systems
Dr. M. Jadhav
Principal Scientist Space Systems
Dr. C. Culligan
Systems Engineering Lead
Dr. S. Poradosú
Lead: Aerospace Bio
Nicholas Dillon
Research Lead: AI Governance
Aaron Zak
Research Lead: Human Factors
Research Areas
Unit 03 conducts applied research across the following focus areas.
Research Area A: Frontier Logistics
Investigating metabolic performance and closed-loop supply chains in extreme isolation (Antarctic and deep-space analogs).
Research Area B: Systemic Governance
Investigating High-Reliability Organisation (HRO) principles and AI governance frameworks applicable to complex organisational systems operating under conditions of uncertainty.
Working Papers
Recent publications, pre-prints, and research outputs from Unit 03.
One Architecture, Three Descriptions: A Unified Mapping of Beer's Viable Systems Model, the EU AI Act Essential Requirements, the Nannini Agentic Compliance Sequence, and VAIAS-ORG Across a Single Coherent Architecture
Andrew Hodgers — President and Principal Investigator, Unit 03
Version 2.0 · June 2026 (supersedes v1.0, May 2026)
It is the contention of this paper that four frameworks currently treated as separate in practice are not independent of one another. Beer's Viable Systems Model (VSM), developed between 1972 and 1985; the EU AI Act's essential requirements as set out in Articles 9–17 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689; the twelve-step agentic compliance sequence developed by Nannini et al. (2026); and the VAIAS-ORG three-layer architecture for sublinear AI scaling are, it is proposed here, four descriptions of the same underlying architecture. They originate in different intellectual traditions and operate at different levels of abstraction, but viewed through the lens of viability they describe substantially the same structure. The VSM, grounded in Ashby's Law of Requisite Variety and the Conant-Ashby Theorem, provides the theoretical foundation. The AI Act's essential requirements are the regulatory expression of what those cybernetic theorems establish as necessary for a system to remain governable under conditions of increasing autonomy and environmental complexity. The Nannini compliance sequence is the operational translation of those requirements into a provider-facing programme. VAIAS-ORG is a proposed design methodology for implementing the resulting architecture in enterprise AI deployment contexts. This correspondence is demonstrated through systematic cross-mapping at the level of each VSM system function, each essential requirement, each compliance step, and each VAIAS-ORG layer. The practical implication is significant: an organisation implementing any one of these frameworks well is, to a substantial degree, implementing the structure the others describe. An organisation that does not implement the shared cybernetic architecture is, it is argued here, likely to find the AI Act's essential requirements difficult to satisfy in a sustainable way as system complexity grows. This is advanced as a structural argument grounded in cybernetic theory, not as a legal determination; conformity remains a matter for qualified assessment.
Keywords
Viable Systems Model · EU AI Act · Agentic AI Compliance · Sublinear Scaling · Ashby's Law · Conant-Ashby Theorem · Article 14 · Behavioural Drift
Revision Note (v2)
The framing of the four-framework relationship has been revised from "equivalence" to structural correspondence; VAIAS-ORG and the Sublinear Scaling Index are identified as proposed frameworks; a competing-interests statement has been added; and provenance material has been removed. This version supersedes v1.0.
Suggested Citation
Hodgers, A. (2026). One Architecture, Three Descriptions (Version 2.0). IHRI Unit 03 Working Paper IHRI-U03-WP-2026-001. International Health Research Institute, Birkirkara, Malta.
Regulatory Compliance Note
Unit 03 (Complex Systems & Space) is an independent applied research node operated by the International Health Research Institute (IHRI) under Pillar II (Applied Research) and is not part of the regulated Pillar I academic school. Participation, research alignment, or data-sharing within this unit does not confer academic credit towards the MFHEA-accredited Doctor of Health Science (DHS) programme. For information regarding our formal MQF/EQF Level 8 degree qualifications, please refer to the Doctoral School.
Navigating Complexity.
Research organisations, academic institutions, and clinical partners are welcome to explore collaborative research enquiries with Unit 03.
Research Partnership Enquiry
Aaron Zak
Research Lead: Human Factors
Unit 03: Complex Systems
Cognitive Engineering &
Decision Integrity.
Research Focus
Aaron Zak specialises in the Human-Machine Interface (HMI) within high-reliability environments. His research focuses on the "Cognitive Last Mile" — the critical juncture where automated intelligence is translated into human decision and action.
IHRI Research Role
Within Unit 03, Zak leads research into human factors integration for AI-driven governance frameworks, including the CORTEX and NERVE architectures. His work investigates how interface design can support human agency and reduce cognitive load in complex, high-stakes decision environments.
"If the algorithm is perfect but the Commander is overwhelmed, the system fails. We engineer the interface to ensure that the human remains the primary governor of the signal."
— Aaron Zak